Richard Dawkins answers "the most simplest question" from a Liberty U student. I direct all the people (primarily evangelicals) who don't get it and ...
How can you point out that the Pakistani government was wiring money to Mohamad Atta and then make the conclusion that that means the United States government funded the 911 hijackers? Why doesn't that mean that the Pakistani government funded the 911 hijackers? Pakistan has a lot more to gain, with regards to their specific geopolitical region, from forcing themselves into a position where they can become allies of the United States than the American political right wing has to gain from blowing up two buildings and then lying about it. Good lord, does anyone even bother to use their brains anymore when they're listening to this stuff?